Question regarding rail closures

Adelaide / South Australia Transport Discussion
Post Reply
TA3001
Posts: 1987
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:01 pm
Favourite Vehicle: 1640. In service - 1738
Location: Earth's Scania capital

Question regarding rail closures

Post by TA3001 »

With the Adelaide-Salisbury electrification expected to take place during the next couple of years, is there a chance we'll see some withdrawn (from regular service) SL202s on rail sub runs between Adelaide and Salisbury? I'm just curious.
User avatar
Lt. Commander Data
Posts: 2327
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 9:09 am
Favourite Vehicle: Scania L94UB
Location: Adelaide Hills

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by Lt. Commander Data »

You'd think that all the ex- rail sub CB80s would be rail subs again, instead of the SL 202s
First person on 822, 865 (2016 re-route).
Last person on 164, 867, 868
jibb
Posts: 4735
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:59 pm
Location: 265

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by jibb »

There is still over 30 MAN SG280 Artics stored at Elizabeth Depot,that can be reinstated for use as rail subs if the electrification does proceed?
TA3001
Posts: 1987
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:01 pm
Favourite Vehicle: 1640. In service - 1738
Location: Earth's Scania capital

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by TA3001 »

I would've thought that the SGs would reached their age limit even for rail sub use by then. When was the last time a 29-31 year old bus saw use on an Admet run?

Nonetheless, though, it'd be nice to catch them again, especially the ones with ZFs. I do miss 2364 and 2367 a little bit.
User avatar
Tonsley213
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:45 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Scania

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by Tonsley213 »

One would hope they electrify the line with out weekday closures.
User avatar
The Phonj
Administrator
Posts: 2874
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 11:09 pm
Favourite Vehicle: MAN SL202, PMCSA body
Location: Somewhere in suburban Adelaide
Contact:

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by The Phonj »

With the "Torrens to Torrens" South Rd project involving the elevation of the Outer Harbor/Grange railway over South Rd (fact sheet link: http://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/__d ... y_2014.pdf) those lines may be looking at upcoming closures to accommodate the project.
Bus Preservation Association of South Australia https://www.bpasa.org.au/
Tramway Museum St. Kilda https://www.trammuseumadelaide.com/
National Railway Museum, Port Adelaide https://nrm.org.au/
I Follow PAFC
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 5:13 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Any low floor bus

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by I Follow PAFC »

A temporary bypass single rail track will be able to operate during construction, resulting in only minor service disruptions over a six to nine month construction timeframe.
Eurostar
Posts: 621
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 1:42 pm
Favourite Vehicle: XPT
Location: Adelaide Parklands Terminal

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by Eurostar »

I Follow PAFC wrote:A temporary bypass single rail track will be able to operate during construction, resulting in only minor service disruptions over a six to nine month construction timeframe.
With a temporary level crossing?
Next station is Victoria Square. Change here for all trains.
I Follow PAFC
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 5:13 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Any low floor bus

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by I Follow PAFC »

Eurostar wrote:
I Follow PAFC wrote:A temporary bypass single rail track will be able to operate during construction, resulting in only minor service disruptions over a six to nine month construction timeframe.
With a temporary level crossing?
That is in http://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/__d ... y_2014.pdf so not sure.
Eurostar
Posts: 621
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 1:42 pm
Favourite Vehicle: XPT
Location: Adelaide Parklands Terminal

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by Eurostar »

With a temporary level crossing?[/quote]

That is in http://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/__d ... y_2014.pdf so not sure.[/quote]

With 6 trains outbound and 5 trains inbound between 5pm and 6pm combined with vehicles it could get messy
Next station is Victoria Square. Change here for all trains.
I Follow PAFC
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 5:13 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Any low floor bus

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by I Follow PAFC »

Maybe there will be no Grange train with the Outer Harbor train been 30mins and not 15mins.
User avatar
The Phonj
Administrator
Posts: 2874
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 11:09 pm
Favourite Vehicle: MAN SL202, PMCSA body
Location: Somewhere in suburban Adelaide
Contact:

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by The Phonj »

I have trouble contemplating how a road can be lowered under a new rail bridge while the road is still in use and a temporary bypass track (which won't be that far from the new bridge) has a level crossing on the same road.
Bus Preservation Association of South Australia https://www.bpasa.org.au/
Tramway Museum St. Kilda https://www.trammuseumadelaide.com/
National Railway Museum, Port Adelaide https://nrm.org.au/
Eurostar
Posts: 621
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 1:42 pm
Favourite Vehicle: XPT
Location: Adelaide Parklands Terminal

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by Eurostar »

The Phonj wrote:I have trouble contemplating how a road can be lowered under a new rail bridge while the road is still in use and a temporary bypass track (which won't be that far from the new bridge) has a level crossing on the same road.
IMO the South roads will need be lowered first then the railway put over the new roads. I don't see how a temporary railway would work without being disruptive to the rest of the project
Next station is Victoria Square. Change here for all trains.
PD2/20
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 11:45 pm

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by PD2/20 »

Eurostar wrote:
The Phonj wrote:I have trouble contemplating how a road can be lowered under a new rail bridge while the road is still in use and a temporary bypass track (which won't be that far from the new bridge) has a level crossing on the same road.
IMO the South roads will need be lowered first then the railway put over the new roads. I don't see how a temporary railway would work without being disruptive to the rest of the project
According to the artist's impression in the factsheet there will be eventually be 10 lanes of roadway under the rail bridge plus reservations for the piers. Because of the substation most of the road formation will be to the east of the existing alignment. The excavation of the surface roads will presumably be c. 1-2m. The temporary rail track will most likely be on the south side of the existing rail line and could be located to avoid too much of a climb to/from the excavated section. It should be possible to accomodate 4 lanes of roadway through the bridge location while it is constructed. Partial excavation of the underpass lanes could take place before the bridge spans are installed and rail established over the bridge.

In many ways the project is similar to the Gallipoli underpass & tram overpass which was accomplished with staged work while maintaining traffic flows. Traffic also may be encouraged to take alternative routes such as James Congdon Drive which will be duplicated between South and Sir Donald Bradman.
User avatar
jarf
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 4:24 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Scania L94UA/Volgren CR228L
Location: Stab Albans
Contact:

Re: Question regarding rail closures

Post by jarf »

The Phonj wrote:I have trouble contemplating how a road can be lowered under a new rail bridge while the road is still in use and a temporary bypass track (which won't be that far from the new bridge) has a level crossing on the same road.
It gets tricky, but it can be done.

The easiest way is generally to temporarily divert the road to one side, assemble the rail bridge on the old road alignment, and then move it into place during a rail shutdown and then dig out around it. (Try Googling Taylors Road or Anderson Road in Melbourne for examples)

It's certainly a little more complicated because the rail line is going to be raised slightly as well. Although it wouldn't be impossible to also include a temporary rail line diversion, depending on the amount of space that's available. :wink:
Random Gunzel Insanity - http://jarfness.blogspot.com/
Post Reply

Return to “Discussion - Adelaide / SA”