STA Observations - January to June 2018

Sydney / New South Wales Transport Discussion
User avatar
Fleet Lists
Administrator
Posts: 23803
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: The Shire

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Fleet Lists »

Very true and because of that I suspect that anything that might be suggested would be rejected.

And one important point you make is that it is NOT just a NSW problem as some people would like to make out.
Living in the Shire.
tonyp
Posts: 12348
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:31 am

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by tonyp »

Fleet Lists wrote:Very true and because of that I suspect that anything that might be suggested would be rejected.

And one important point you make is that it is NOT just a NSW problem as some people would like to make out.
It would have its origins in the battle to control the runaway costs of public transport in years past and doubtless it works well in that respect. But the customer may suffer because of the loss of flexibility, though that would be down to how well the agency itself performs. There's a big difference between the jurisdictions in that regard, for example NSW and WA being polar opposites.

I would suggest in general that there is a need for a much larger proportion of artics in Australian bus fleets. This would help soak up some of the inherent deficiencies. Artics can also save on staff costs which I understand is the largest operating cost.
User avatar
Swift
Posts: 13247
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:23 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra
Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Swift »

These models all forget the ones that should be most important, the customers.
On one hand they want to watch costs, but are unwilling to adjust to meet higher demand and grab the revenue that comes with it, then letting people down who want the service.
NSW, the state that embraces mediocrity.
User avatar
Fleet Lists
Administrator
Posts: 23803
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: The Shire

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Fleet Lists »

But what is your solution?
Living in the Shire.
Jurassic_Joke
Posts: 1138
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 10:08 pm

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Jurassic_Joke »

Happy first birthday to the first of the 2nd Gen Volvo B7 CB80 buses, namely, 2826 (entered service roughly a year ago now) which restored a bit of my faith in State Transit! Great product, equally happy with its Scania counterpart at Port Botany (however scarce they are)
User avatar
Swift
Posts: 13247
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:23 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra
Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Swift »

Poor orphan that it is. FL, reimbursement based on tap on figures for any extra buses put on.
NSW, the state that embraces mediocrity.
Stu
Posts: 4344
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Stu »

2886 will eventually be transferred to L-Depot.
In Transit
Posts: 385
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:13 am

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by In Transit »

Swift wrote:Poor orphan that it is. FL, reimbursement based on tap on figures for any extra buses put on.
This wouldn't be as straight forward as it sounds.

For example, I have trip which is carrying 60 passengers and regularly leaves around 20 passengers behind. I then add an additional trip to carry those passengers - this trip now carries 40 passengers. However, many of these were abstracted from my original trip, which now also carries 40 passengers.

From government's point of view, patronage has only increased by 20, not the 40 who are tapping on for the new trip, so they would only want to pay for the 20. Let's assume the contract does provide for payments for extra services based on patronage.
- Actual fare revenue from the 20 passengers is unlikely to cover the cost to government of operating the extra trip. Lets assume costs have doubled with the extra trip, but we know patronage has only grown by 33%.
- Overall patronage may not grow by 20, as some of the passengers left behind may have previously waited for the next service. The service improvement may induce extra demand, but this is difficult to forecast.
- The private operator will have to weigh up the extra payments from government for the 20 passengers against their operating costs; this may not work out profitably for them in which case they won't do it and depends on the agreed price for those extra passengers (if this is directly related to fares revenue then the entire concept is dead in the water).
- Very few bus contracting models put this level of risk of patronage on the operator, as patronage is massively influenced by factors they don't control - the economy (see Perth's PT patronage over the last couple of years), government fares decisions, government timetable instructions etc.
- Over the term of the contract, managing variations will get very messy as you track which services were changed for patronage, which were changed by government instruction etc etc.

One fundamental issue that anyone who has planned services is critically aware of is the need for certainty for government in budgeting costs. There are no blank cheques - so open ended arrangements for additional services or increases in operating costs don't wash. Sure, you can have a budget for those - but what happens when the money runs out?

None of this is to say that tying operator's revenue to patronage is impossible - its not. However, it does get complicated very quickly, and do not underestimate the cost to government of shifting that risk to the operator - this will be reflected in increased contract prices and profit margins to the operators (current margins are low, reflecting the level of risk and capital expenditure operators are faced with).
Frosty
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:16 pm

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Frosty »

In the scenario highlighted above maybe the solution would be have some 12.5m buses configured for high density standing. Reduce seating and in turn increase standing room. It reminds me often of early Saturday morning 309 services. Or a 14.5m bus providing route allows it.
Stu wrote:2886 will eventually be transferred to L-Depot.
Is be P losing it’s CB80s ? Maybe the CB80s were to foreign foreign at P :lol:
tonyp
Posts: 12348
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:31 am

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by tonyp »

In Transit wrote: None of this is to say that tying operator's revenue to patronage is impossible - its not. However, it does get complicated very quickly, and do not underestimate the cost to government of shifting that risk to the operator - this will be reflected in increased contract prices and profit margins to the operators (current margins are low, reflecting the level of risk and capital expenditure operators are faced with).
I'm pleased you're revisiting this thread because all eyes are on you (as one obviously deeply in-the-know and experienced in two states) for some answers! :wink:

Are there any overseas models (e.g. in Europe) that might help? I've heard that the Perth model is admired and in some cases adopted overseas, so that probably indicates that there's not much better elsewhere. Incidentally, I'm previously aware of the skewed deployment of artics in Perth, which indicates that this model isn't working as it should. Artics should obviously be on the services on which they're most needed. Apart from that, I find that Perth's bus system is generally a dream to use.

As the original issue raised here is capacity shortfall under unexpected demand, I can only bring attention yet again to the issue I always raise of the lack of capacity of existing bus fleets, with the result that potential passengers get left behind - which I've seen quite often over the years and most lately on the Gong Shuttle. And it's not that the buses lack theoretical capacity, but they're just not loaded properly because their designs and passenger-processing ability are so poor.

A 12 metre bus in Europe is typically classed to carry up to 100 people. In Perth it's 82; on the east coast they struggle to get more than 60-70 on them (that is, if they're not throttled at 58 by the RTBU). It seems to me obvious that some of these situations where extra buses are needed to be fed in at short notice (but can't be because of the system) wouldn't arise if more people could get on the existing buses. The productivity of 12 metre rigid buses in Australia is pretty dreadful and I've outlined the reasons many times previously - steps in the aisle, lack of doors, front door-only loading.

So, either the agencies are going to have to address that issue or, if they can't/won't, then as I said before, there is a need to greatly enlarge the artic fleet in Australia because they are the buses that can definitely do the job properly, provided they are properly specified with the full complement of doors and a fully or mostly low floor. (Deckers won't cut it because of their dwells and slowness.) The trick then is to ensure that they are deployed most effectively. Surely that's possible even in the most restrictive contract regime?

The alternative is that we will lose the battle to grow public transport patronage.
gld59
Posts: 1432
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:30 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by gld59 »

tonyp wrote:It seems to me obvious that some of these situations where extra buses are needed to be fed in at short notice (but can't be because of the system) wouldn't arise if more people could get on the existing buses.
But that (of itself) is just delaying the problem until patronage grows in proportion to the extra capacity. It would only be useful in the long term if any existing loading level targets (if those do actually exist) were maintained, thereby using the capacity increase as a buffer.

gld
stajourneyman
Posts: 1431
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 10:43 pm

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by stajourneyman »

...was just perusing the STA fleet list, and noticed that there is a gap in recent fleet numbers.

After the Brooky B7 Bustechs (ending in 2724, there appears to be no allocation of fleet numbers frpm 2725 to 2748 inclusive.

In the immortal words of the late great Professor Julius Sumner Miller (in an annoying American accent!) ..why is this so??
User avatar
Ikarbus
Posts: 1323
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Ikarbus »

stajourneyman wrote:...was just perusing the STA fleet list, and noticed that there is a gap in recent fleet numbers.

After the Brooky B7 Bustechs (ending in 2724, there appears to be no allocation of fleet numbers frpm 2725 to 2748 inclusive.

In the immortal words of the late great Professor Julius Sumner Miller (in an annoying American accent!) ..why is this so??
These were allocated to Volvo B7 VSTs that ended up getting transferred to Newcastle Transport. Check the Newcastle fleetlists, they're there.
stajourneyman
Posts: 1431
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 10:43 pm

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by stajourneyman »

Yes, of course !!

Excuse my public brain fade!
User avatar
Richard290
Posts: 212
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:39 am
Favourite Vehicle: Volvo B8RLE Volgren Optimus
Location: Carlingford, NSW
Contact:

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Richard290 »

Here’s some outdated route information still on show at Lane Cove Interchange Stand C (stop 2066 228).

140 has been discontinued
252 now extends to Gladesville
289 no longer runs, having been replaced by a rerouted 292
292 now runs via Mowbray Rd
Info for route 530 is missing. 530 runs to Burwood via Drummoyne and Five Dock.
I sent some feedback to TfNSW, hopefully they’ll update the route information soon.
Image
Living at the north end of the 513 & 535. and the confluence of 513, 535, 546, 549, 550, 553, 625 & 630.
User avatar
Swift
Posts: 13247
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:23 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra
Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Swift »

Richard290 wrote: 292 now runs via Mowbray Rd
Instead of Epping Rd? Where does it go after Mowbray Rd inbound?
NSW, the state that embraces mediocrity.
User avatar
swtt
Posts: 5665
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:49 pm

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by swtt »

Swift wrote:
Richard290 wrote: 292 now runs via Mowbray Rd
Instead of Epping Rd? Where does it go after Mowbray Rd inbound?
Back to Epping Road just before the interchange :)

Sent from my Huawei Mate 9 using Tapatalk
OKO
Posts: 425
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:04 pm

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by OKO »

Swift wrote:
Richard290 wrote: 292 now runs via Mowbray Rd
Instead of Epping Rd? Where does it go after Mowbray Rd inbound?
Right into Centennial, then left Epping rd.
User avatar
Swift
Posts: 13247
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:23 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra
Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Swift »

But Y? (get it?).
NSW, the state that embraces mediocrity.
OKO
Posts: 425
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:04 pm

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by OKO »

Swift wrote:But Y? (get it?).
M, I do not know. It certainly P'ed off a lot of the people who live on Epping Rd west of Centennial.
User avatar
Richard290
Posts: 212
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:39 am
Favourite Vehicle: Volvo B8RLE Volgren Optimus
Location: Carlingford, NSW
Contact:

STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Richard290 »

Other news from yesterday, I caught 1721 (an artic) from M running the 11:25am 292 Marsfield service. I’m not quite sure why M would run an artic at that time since there were only two passengers on board the 292 between Lane Cove Interchange and Macquarie Centre the whole way.
Might be a bit of an overestimate in patronage, perhaps?
Another news was when the M54 was pulling into Stand D on Beecroft Road at Epping Station. The bus was 1701, another artic which had been blocked by two other STA buses in Stands E and F which were in the way of the bus pulling into Stand D in the middle of afternoon traffic which caused at conflict with the two other buses. Even worse was the fact the M54 bus was full with many Epping Boys students blocking access to the small rear door.
Living at the north end of the 513 & 535. and the confluence of 513, 535, 546, 549, 550, 553, 625 & 630.
User avatar
J_Busworth
Posts: 680
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:56 am
Favourite Vehicle: Scania L113TRB Ansair Orana
Location: On the X74, because it's faster than the tram
Contact:

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by J_Busworth »

Richard290 wrote:Here’s some outdated route information still on show at Lane Cove Interchange Stand C (stop 2066 228).

140 has been discontinued
252 now extends to Gladesville
289 no longer runs, having been replaced by a rerouted 292
292 now runs via Mowbray Rd
Info for route 530 is missing. 530 runs to Burwood via Drummoyne and Five Dock.
I sent some feedback to TfNSW, hopefully they’ll update the route information soon.
Image
There are dozens of stops with incorrect information. I know of a couple stop where the information is just plain wrong, not even out of date. TfNSW doesn't generally do anything about it unless it is in one of the the Contract cross over zones like in the CBD.
https://transportnswblog.com
RIP STA L113s 28/01/93 - 12/01/22
burrumbus
Posts: 2049
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:12 pm

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by burrumbus »

Richard290 wrote:Other news from yesterday, I caught 1721 (an artic) from M running the 11:25am 292 Marsfield service. I’m not quite sure why M would run an artic at that time since there were only two passengers on board the 292 between Lane Cove Interchange and Macquarie Centre the whole way.
Might be a bit of an overestimate in patronage, perhaps?
Another news was when the M54 was pulling into Stand D on Beecroft Road at Epping Station. The bus was 1701, another artic which had been blocked by two other STA buses in Stands E and F which were in the way of the bus pulling into Stand D in the middle of afternoon traffic which caused at conflict with the two other buses. Even worse was the fact the M54 bus was full with many Epping Boys students blocking access to the small rear door.
Just the normal bizarre,ill thought out STA rostering practices !!
User avatar
Ray
Posts: 1150
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:13 am

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Ray »

I’m not quite sure why M would run an artic at that time since there were only two passengers on board the 292 between Lane Cove Interchange and Macquarie Centre the whole way.
No doubt the bus left the depot, did that particular 292 trip and then immediately went straight back to the depot. Silly bus!
Go Cats.
Stu
Posts: 4344
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: STA Observations - January to June 2018

Post by Stu »

TfNSW are probably waiting to apply the HOP to certain areas when the time nears for a particular double deck train line to be converted to a metro line.
Post Reply

Return to “Discussion - Sydney / NSW”