• Advertisement

WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Perth / Western Australia Transport Discussion

Moderators: perthbus, Mr OC Benz

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby Leyland B21 » Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:51 am

Bus Suggestions wrote:Question: Can anyone tell me what route the 1979-1983 LincLine buses took?
This is purely on memory.
Terminus in Bennett St East Perth. Left Wittenoom St, Left Hill St, Right Wellington St, Roberts Rd, Railway Rd, Left Loch St, Right Stirling Hwy, Right Queen Victoria Street, Right Parry Street, Left Cantonment Street to terminate near Queen Street.

Return was Queen Street, Left Adelaide Street, Queen Victoria Street, Left Stirling Hwy, Left Loch Street, Right Railway Rd, Continue straight Roberts Rd, Continue straight Wellington Street, left Bennett Street.

Roberts Rd and Hay Street were both bi directional back in the day.

Route 72 to Cottesloe back then picked up the slack of servicing Swanbourne and Grant Street Stations by travelling Stirling Hwy, Stirling Rd, Curtin Ave, Eric St. Once Burke reopened the Freo Line, Route 72 was realigned to service the full length of Eric St between Marine Pde and Stirling Hwy.


Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
You can take the boy out of Armadale W.A but you cant take Armadale out of the boy!!!
User avatar
Leyland B21
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 11:12 pm
Location: Narre Warren!!!
Has thanked: 244 times
Been thanked: 75 times
Favourite Vehicle: Former Perth B21 /#32

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby pasha241 » Wed Aug 29, 2018 1:21 pm

Why i never see 100/101 and 960 run by artic bus. is it specific reason why they cant run artic bus even though this route are bussy route or is that just the depo rooster allocated. because i saw artic on other route like 34/7x even 284
list of my photo taken you can be found at https://busenthusiastic.wordpress.com/
my youtube channel at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTCdKn ... OUqcedvUdg
pasha241
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 6:47 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby Merc1107 » Wed Aug 29, 2018 2:38 pm

pasha241 wrote:Why i never see 100/101 and 960 run by artic bus. is it specific reason why they cant run artic bus even though this route are bussy route or is that just the depo rooster allocated. because i saw artic on other route like 34/7x even 284

The provisions at Canning Bridge Station are barely adequate for two rigid buses at it stands. With 100 and 101 services sometimes departing concurrently, or multiple terminating services utilising the u-turn sequence of the lights, it just wouldn't be practicable, unless the traffic light's sensors and programming were altered to better-prioritise buses. As it stands, the bus u-turn and westbound sequences only occur once in the light cycle. Buses get about 5 seconds in that sequence (it should be variable). With several buses waiting to utilise the u-turn, you would likely cause chaos holding up westbound buses.

In the future, a more functional interchange is intended to be built at Canning Bridge. Of course, it also needs to be designed to be friendly for articulated bus operations and future expansion, unlike the majority of other southern-suburbs interchanges...

My understanding of 960s rarely (if ever) having articulated buses allocated is due to insufficient layover space at Curtin University & ECU Mt. Lawley, in fact, ECU Mt Lawley mightn't even be artic-friendly.
Merc1107
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 6:38 pm
Location: Perth
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 94 times
Favourite Vehicle: High Floor Buses

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby the c man » Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:38 pm

pasha241 wrote:Why i never see 100/101 and 960 run by artic bus. is it specific reason why they cant run artic bus even though this route are bussy route or is that just the depo rooster allocated. because i saw artic on other route like 34/7x even 284


3083 did 960 service yesterday morning around 845 heading to curtin uni. Saw it on plain street in East Perth
the c man
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:03 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 54 times

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby pasha241 » Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:50 pm

Merc1107 wrote:
pasha241 wrote:Why i never see 100/101 and 960 run by artic bus. is it specific reason why they cant run artic bus even though this route are bussy route or is that just the depo rooster allocated. because i saw artic on other route like 34/7x even 284

The provisions at Canning Bridge Station are barely adequate for two rigid buses at it stands. With 100 and 101 services sometimes departing concurrently, or multiple terminating services utilising the u-turn sequence of the lights, it just wouldn't be practicable, unless the traffic light's sensors and programming were altered to better-prioritise buses. As it stands, the bus u-turn and westbound sequences only occur once in the light cycle. Buses get about 5 seconds in that sequence (it should be variable). With several buses waiting to utilise the u-turn, you would likely cause chaos holding up westbound buses.

In the future, a more functional interchange is intended to be built at Canning Bridge. Of course, it also needs to be designed to be friendly for articulated bus operations and future expansion, unlike the majority of other southern-suburbs interchanges...

My understanding of 960s rarely (if ever) having articulated buses allocated is due to insufficient layover space at Curtin University & ECU Mt. Lawley, in fact, ECU Mt Lawley mightn't even be artic-friendly.


ok thx i forgot also the sharp u turn intersection at canning. btw before i thought it is because too small station and only has 1 line but how come other route like 114, 115, 160, 910 can use artic and these route is not as busy as 100/101 in peak uni (except 910).

For 960 is weird that these bussy route not have enough artic because insufficient layover. Maybe artic can use for FULL 960 not Mt lawley 960 one. and at curtin why there is other curtin route can use artic like 72, 75, 34 and circle route even 70 and odd 284. if the reason because is insufficient space at curtin maybe these route should has same number of artic shifts as 960

maybe in the future for artic shift on 960 they should have no layover i mean like when 960 arrived at curtin it should straight doing rooster of 960 back to city
list of my photo taken you can be found at https://busenthusiastic.wordpress.com/
my youtube channel at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTCdKn ... OUqcedvUdg
pasha241
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 6:47 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby Bus-1809 » Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:50 pm

Due to stand arrangements at Perth Busport, 960's are not permitted to have articulated vehicles running them, as there is the possibility of them not being able to get onto the allocated stand in certain conditions. This is factored in to the shift cuts, to ensure that 960's are only on shifts that have rigid buses assigned to them. Very seldomly, an artic may appear on one, if a bus is changed off on road by an artic.
If it's not a ZF, take it back!

Holder of W.A's largest transport sound recording collection. Over 1,200 recordings of vehicles and constantly expanding for the enjoyment of future generations.
User avatar
Bus-1809
 
Posts: 2892
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 3:40 pm
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 334 times
Favourite Vehicle: As long as it's not a B7...

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby Merc1107 » Thu Aug 30, 2018 10:48 am

Mr. 1809 covered the bit I forgot about. In which case it also points to poor programming of the DSMS (Dynamic Stand Management System) at Perth Busport.

pasha241 wrote:btw before i thought it is because too small station and only has 1 line but how come other route like 114, 115, 160, 910 can use artic and these route is not as busy as 100/101 in peak uni (except 910).
All other routes you city definitely get busy at times throughout the day, and naturally we're talking several routes servicing a part (or all) of Canning Hwy as opposed to the 100 and 101 being the exclusive means of accessing Curtin from Canning Bridge.

Also note there is no issue with westbound services utilising articulated buses as Canning Bridge is not a timed stop, nor do services terminate there to commence other runs. It is only a compulsory stop.

pasha241 wrote:For 960 is weird that these bussy route not have enough artic because insufficient layover. Maybe artic can use for FULL 960 not Mt lawley 960 one. and at curtin why there is other curtin route can use artic like 72, 75, 34 and circle route even 70 and odd 284...

maybe in the future for artic shift on 960 they should have no layover i mean like when 960 arrived at curtin it should straight doing rooster of 960 back to city
Bear in mind some of the other services you mention don't always terminate at Curtin University.

As for turnaround times, if your trip to Curtin runs late for whatever reason, the turnaround time can help to alleviate the inadequate slack in the timetable. Eliminating it would not only increase the possibility of late running, it would increase stress on drivers who are faced with even later running if they need to secure their bus to use the toilet (for example).
Merc1107
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 6:38 pm
Location: Perth
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 94 times
Favourite Vehicle: High Floor Buses

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby Shoudy Chen » Mon Sep 03, 2018 5:36 pm

I have a query. I have seen a few Mercedes Benz OC500LE CNG (Ex-CAT) and Diesel (ex-Transperth) as well as new Volvo Buses that do not contain rear windows. I was wondering why the back of the bus had no rear windows.
2. There are two transmission variants for the Mercedes OC500LE (TransRegional) - ZF Ecomat and Ecolife. Why Transperth decided to have both the Ecomat and the Ecolife transmissions since their delivery back in late 2010? What sort of Emission standards do they meet? Euro 4, 5 or 6?
User avatar
Shoudy Chen
 
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 11:55 am
Location: Perth
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby Merc1107 » Tue Sep 04, 2018 10:31 am

Shoudy Chen wrote:There are two transmission variants for the Mercedes OC500LE (TransRegional) - ZF Ecomat and Ecolife. Why Transperth decided to have both the Ecomat and the Ecolife transmissions since their delivery back in late 2010? What sort of Emission standards do they meet? Euro 4, 5 or 6?
My understanding was the Ecomat transmission was superseded by the Ecolife around this time.

These OCs are diesel, and will be Euro III or Euro V dependent on age (VIN number will be the giveaway; Euro V has a chassis number starting with WEB6344202 and Euro III starts with WEB6342202). Gas OCs are Euro IV.
Merc1107
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 6:38 pm
Location: Perth
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 94 times
Favourite Vehicle: High Floor Buses

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby Guy_Arab » Tue Sep 04, 2018 11:10 am

some member was asking about a ZF 6 SPEED gearbox for a V8 Mercedes contact me
GUY ARAB
User avatar
Guy_Arab
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 9:11 pm
Location: Perth W.A.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 33 times
Favourite Vehicle: M.A.N Bus & Guy Arab

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby Off The Rails » Tue Sep 04, 2018 5:21 pm

Merc1107 wrote:
Shoudy Chen wrote:There are two transmission variants for the Mercedes OC500LE (TransRegional) - ZF Ecomat and Ecolife. Why Transperth decided to have both the Ecomat and the Ecolife transmissions since their delivery back in late 2010? What sort of Emission standards do they meet? Euro 4, 5 or 6?
My understanding was the Ecomat transmission was superseded by the Ecolife around this time.

These OCs are diesel, and will be Euro III or Euro V dependent on age (VIN number will be the giveaway; Euro V has a chassis number starting with WEB6344202 and Euro III starts with WEB6342202). Gas OCs are Euro IV.

I was thinking Shoudy Chen was talking about the ex-Transperth OC Diesels... if so, they're both Euro 5. The gearboxes, I'm gonna hazard a guess at some of the OC's were built with one of the last batches of Ecomat's, while the rest were given Ecolife's.

Cheers! :wink:
Part of a 8 person trek to Mongolia, during July 2016.
Officially the last person to tag off the 381 - 20/5/16.
User avatar
Off The Rails
 
Posts: 1015
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:47 pm
Location: No where near the Gutta
Has thanked: 211 times
Been thanked: 196 times
Favourite Vehicle: Anything with an engine brake

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby PoweredByCNG » Wed Sep 05, 2018 4:06 pm

End of 2010 was the transition from Ecomat to EcoLife on the OC 500 LE/RF chassis production. Operators did not get a choice.
Proud owner of ex-Transperth 1042, ex-Transperth 1114 and ex-STA Adelaide 1549.
User avatar
PoweredByCNG
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: WA
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 275 times
Favourite Vehicle: Mercedes-Benz O 405

Re: WA Transport General Discussion & Questions - 2018

Postby Zidanehartono » Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:58 pm

Does anyone know who is the operator of this Express-bodied Volvo B7R, registered as 1DRZ185? Looked up on Perthbus.info and it only shows 1DRZ662.

Image
Officially the first person to photograph a B-Series @ Armadale Station.

Watch/Subscribe to my Youtube Channel/Videos:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-M7QInyEuWVWJNmVav1E_w
User avatar
Zidanehartono
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 8:48 pm
Location: Perth,Australia
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Previous


  • Advertisement

Return to Discussion - Perth / WA

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests