Moderator: T1200
toowongman wrote:Have certain units been allocated to this run or will they just use whatever is available for the meanwhile?
BT Buses wrote:
BT Buses wrote:Made using Photoshop, then converted to imageready to get the rotating effect.
But please feel free to make your own, its been sometime since i've made one of these gif files.
Just a reminder though, don't take pics on the Busway platform if going to the Cultural Ctr, take the pics from the southern end of the Victoria Bridge, and don't do what i've seen somebody else do and hang over the rail to take pics as this can cause an un-necessary distraction for the drivers.
dude wrote:Just a reminder though, don't take pics on the Busway platform if going to the Cultural Ctr, take the pics from the southern end of the Victoria Bridge, and don't do what i've seen somebody else do and hang over the rail to take pics as this can cause an un-necessary distraction for the drivers.
Few over-enthusiastic foamers there? Are the gestapo booking people for taking photos at busway platforms these days?
AnonymouslyBad wrote:Kind of weird that they're not using artics...
noofnoof wrote:they'd have to repaint existing artics, or purchase new ones. they have gone with a seperate 'pool' for the city glider buses, it probably makes it easier for passengers, but does it reduce operational flexibility.
leccy wrote:The City Glider as implemented is a perfect example of completely missing the point. The service as originally conceived was supposed to be a high frequency, high capacity bus rapid transport service that would serve the same role as LRT (but be cheaper). As a reminder, take a look at http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/bccwr/about_council/documents/sept07_final_report_brisbane_mass_transit_investigation_lmt.pdf and especially pages 38-40 to get an idea of the sort of vehicle suggested.
Instead we get a bog standard bus with a new paint scheme. Brillant.
simonl wrote:Everything about this seems to show real tension between BCC and TL. Doesn't seem like TL want the service at all, and BCC are pushing it.
Happy Bus User wrote:It would have been far better just to extend the 192 to Teneriffe and upgrade it's frequency, or add a new express 194 (or any other number) route that goes along the CityGlider path...
simonl wrote:Happy Bus User wrote:It would have been far better just to extend the 192 to Teneriffe and upgrade it's frequency, or add a new express 194 (or any other number) route that goes along the CityGlider path...
I still can't believe the lack of integration. Continuing the eastern part of the 470 and the 192? Shouldn't the 192 be replaced by extensions of selected CityGlider services? 393 could be canned also, with the CityGlider now providing a good connection to rail, I don't see why we need it.
Return to Discussion - Brisbane / QLD
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 1 guest