Parramatta light rail

Sydney / New South Wales Transport Discussion
simonl
Posts: 7986
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:03 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by simonl »

GazzaOak wrote:Lets say they build the light rail and metro at sydney olympic park, would they actually do away with the spur line from lidcombe to SOP (eg would the metro and light rail would be enough for a 200k+ events there).
What a crazy idea. Why lift infrastructure which is useful for no reason? Even if it only shifts 25k or so in an hour after an event, that's still a reasonable dent on the demand.

User avatar
tonyp
Posts: 9380
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:31 pm
Location: Shoalhaven

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by tonyp »

Hallelujah, another topic coming to life on ATDB after the Wollongong bombshell!

Considering the capacity of the stadium and the potential for simultaneous events at several venues, I think they will continue to need every bit of transit they can throw at it - train, metro, tram and bus. I wouldn't remove one iota of existing transit infrastructure.
Perpetually on a T3 to "I. P. Pavlova, přestup na Metro. Příští zastávka, Náměsti Míru"

User avatar
boronia
Posts: 19373
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 7:18 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Dennis
Location: Sydney

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by boronia »

While it will obviously be useful for major events, its patronage at other times might be severely compromised by the other modes?

The metro will see the end of Bankstown line services to/from Lidcombe, further diluting its usefulness.
The Sydney Classic and Antique Truck (and Bus) Show
On again June 2020
@ The Museum of Fire.

User avatar
Swift
Posts: 10899
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:23 am
Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra
Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by Swift »

Aghast at the lack of thought for Lidcombe & surrounds.
Unapologetically hate attention seeking bus pax.

User avatar
tonyp
Posts: 9380
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:31 pm
Location: Shoalhaven

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by tonyp »

boronia wrote:
The metro will see the end of Bankstown line services to/from Lidcombe, further diluting its usefulness.
Won't suburbans still run around to and from Bankstown via Regents Park? Instead of a direct train there'll simply be an interchange at Bankstown to and from a faster train. I don't see the bad in that.
Perpetually on a T3 to "I. P. Pavlova, přestup na Metro. Příští zastávka, Náměsti Míru"

User avatar
rogf24
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 6:20 am

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by rogf24 »

tonyp wrote:
boronia wrote:
The metro will see the end of Bankstown line services to/from Lidcombe, further diluting its usefulness.
Won't suburbans still run around to and from Bankstown via Regents Park? Instead of a direct train there'll simply be an interchange at Bankstown to and from a faster train. I don't see the bad in that.
I think that's the case but if you look at Future Transport, further down the track, the short section of track between the Main South/Bankstown Line junction and Bankstown station could be converted to metro as part of the Parramatta to Kogarah line.

simonl
Posts: 7986
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:03 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by simonl »

tonyp wrote:
boronia wrote:
The metro will see the end of Bankstown line services to/from Lidcombe, further diluting its usefulness.
Won't suburbans still run around to and from Bankstown via Regents Park? Instead of a direct train there'll simply be an interchange at Bankstown to and from a faster train. I don't see the bad in that.
I'm not aware that it has ever been explained what might happen to Birrong and Yagoona, or Lidcombe-Carramar for that matter. Two ridiculous shuttle services seem to be on the cards.

User avatar
Transport: Buses
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:35 am
Favourite Vehicle: Bustech VST on Scania K280UB
Location: Eastern suburbs of Sydney

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by Transport: Buses »

simonl wrote: I'm not aware that it has ever been explained what might happen to Birrong and Yagoona, or Lidcombe-Carramar for that matter. Two ridiculous shuttle services seem to be on the cards.
The most logical solution to this mess (the Bankstown line metro conversion itself being quite illogical) is to bring back the old Inner West line, with now two branches to Liverpool via Regents Park/Villawood and Bankstown via Regents Park/Yagoona.

I also assume that Erskineville and St Peters will also now be the responsibility of the T4. As if the T4 isn't slow enough already :roll: :roll:

jaseee
Posts: 274
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:50 am

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by jaseee »

Erskineville and St Peters will likely be taken over by T8 instead, which makes logical sense given there will also be additional paths for T8 trains as well. T8 trains via Sydenham have a stop at St Peters in the new timetable as well.

Frosty
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:16 am

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by Frosty »

This is might be straying off topic but if T8 trains stop at Erko & St Peters won’t be any faster then via Airport route.
Maybe ideally there should be a continuous rail route of some sort from Bankstown to Olympic Pk through Lidcombe.

Geo101
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:55 am

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by Geo101 »

Frosty wrote:Maybe ideally there should be a continuous rail route of some sort from Bankstown to Olympic Pk through Lidcombe.
Drop a tunnel underneath Lidcombe Station, newly linked underground platform, and bingo.

The problem I suppose is the part which is shared by the freight network.

User avatar
boronia
Posts: 19373
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 7:18 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Dennis
Location: Sydney

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by boronia »

There has been previous talk about extending the metro to LIverpool
The Sydney Classic and Antique Truck (and Bus) Show
On again June 2020
@ The Museum of Fire.

Liamena
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:12 am

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by Liamena »

But the plan for the metro was to go via Milperra and Chipping Norton somewhere, not via the line though Chester Hill.

iamthouth
Posts: 366
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:38 am

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by iamthouth »

Any chance of Metro West taking over SOP, and PLR extended via the rail alignment to Bankstown and Cabramatta in a future stage?

simonl
Posts: 7986
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:03 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by simonl »

Transport: Buses wrote:
simonl wrote: I'm not aware that it has ever been explained what might happen to Birrong and Yagoona, or Lidcombe-Carramar for that matter. Two ridiculous shuttle services seem to be on the cards.
The most logical solution to this mess (the Bankstown line metro conversion itself being quite illogical) is to bring back the old Inner West line, with now two branches to Liverpool via Regents Park/Villawood and Bankstown via Regents Park/Yagoona.

I also assume that Erskineville and St Peters will also now be the responsibility of the T4. As if the T4 isn't slow enough already :roll: :roll:
Urgh to branching the Inner West. If you're going to reinstate the inner west line are you going to fill in the missing bit of the sextup between Homebush and Lidcombe? Highly doubtful, I would say.

I think the most obvious solution for Birrong and Yagoona is to extend the conversion around to new platforms at Regents Park. You would still have a shuttle for Sefton-Carramar though. If you have a bit more money, add some additional track to Lidcombe and convert platform 5 to metro, but in that scenario you still have the problem of needing to reinstate the inner west line.

grog
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:09 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by grog »

Now that T1 will use a single track pair from Homebush to Lidcombe and T2 has its own pair, branching here is not such an issue.

That said, if you were going to reinstate the Inner West line via Regents Park, you might want to make that the only route to the city from Liverpool and pick up the rest of the South line stations with frequent Cumberland line services (extending to take over Richmond branch full time).

(This would of course have to be post-Metro West to make sure you didn't overload city services from Parramatta.)

Liamena
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:12 am

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by Liamena »

Extend the Bankstown metro to Lidcombe, close the Sefton-Cabramatta line completely ( actually hand it over to ARTC ), run more buses.

simonl
Posts: 7986
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:03 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by simonl »

grog wrote:Now that T1 will use a single track pair from Homebush to Lidcombe and T2 has its own pair, branching here is not such an issue.

That said, if you were going to reinstate the Inner West line via Regents Park, you might want to make that the only route to the city from Liverpool and pick up the rest of the South line stations with frequent Cumberland line services (extending to take over Richmond branch full time).

(This would of course have to be post-Metro West to make sure you didn't overload city services from Parramatta.)
Urgh. I want a dislike button again.

Geo101
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:55 am

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by Geo101 »

iamthouth wrote:Any chance of Metro West taking over SOP, and PLR extended via the rail alignment to Bankstown and Cabramatta in a future stage?
Is the metro west going to have the same or more capacity than the existing SOP line? What is the difference in capacity for the new metro (leaving in both directions) versus the existing line with the balloon loop setup?

In any case, it certainly couldn't be implemented until after the metro west was completed, and you would still be looking at a tunnel or overpass at Lidcombe unless you keep the existing requirement to transfer at Lidcombe, which would defeat the purpose I suspect.

grog
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:09 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by grog »

simonl wrote:
grog wrote:Now that T1 will use a single track pair from Homebush to Lidcombe and T2 has its own pair, branching here is not such an issue.

That said, if you were going to reinstate the Inner West line via Regents Park, you might want to make that the only route to the city from Liverpool and pick up the rest of the South line stations with frequent Cumberland line services (extending to take over Richmond branch full time).

(This would of course have to be post-Metro West to make sure you didn't overload city services from Parramatta.)
Urgh. I want a dislike button again.
Replies work fine for expressing displeasure ;)

Liamena
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:12 am

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by Liamena »

There is nothing wrong with the Sydney Olympic Park Line, as such.

The problem with ending the tramway from Parramatta, at Sydney Olympic Park, isn't capacity. The problem is the catastrophic impact on passenger usability of multiple interchanges. If you tried to catch the proposed tram from Wentworth Point or West Meadowbank ( or whatever it is called ), to the end of the tramway at Olympic Park, and then it takes you 15 minutes to change to the train for a 3 minute trip to Lidcombe, and then it takes another 15 minutes to change to the train at Lidcombe, then you are looking at about a 90 minute trip one-way from Wentworth Point to the CBD.

Travellers to the CBD might have to put up with this, but people going anywhere else, where they can park at their destination, will not.

grog
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:09 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by grog »

You are ignoring the fact that they have designed this thing as a feeder for West Metro. I expect that in the end they will stage them to open at the same time, around 2026. That is 3 years after Parramatta Light Rail stage 1.

simonl
Posts: 7986
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:03 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by simonl »

grog wrote:You are ignoring the fact that they have designed this thing as a feeder for West Metro. I expect that in the end they will stage them to open at the same time, around 2026. That is 3 years after Parramatta Light Rail stage 1.
Right... When has a government plan requiring two election wins to start ever actually happened without significant variation? Big difference if you are only talking about one election win.

simonl
Posts: 7986
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:03 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by simonl »

Liamena wrote:There is nothing wrong with the Sydney Olympic Park Line, as such.

The problem with ending the tramway from Parramatta, at Sydney Olympic Park, isn't capacity. The problem is the catastrophic impact on passenger usability of multiple interchanges. If you tried to catch the proposed tram from Wentworth Point or West Meadowbank ( or whatever it is called ), to the end of the tramway at Olympic Park, and then it takes you 15 minutes to change to the train for a 3 minute trip to Lidcombe, and then it takes another 15 minutes to change to the train at Lidcombe, then you are looking at about a 90 minute trip one-way from Wentworth Point to the CBD.

Travellers to the CBD might have to put up with this, but people going anywhere else, where they can park at their destination, will not.
Most of those people could just as easily catch a bus across to Rhodes.

mandonov
Posts: 1687
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:34 am

Re: Parramatta light rail

Post by mandonov »

simonl wrote: Right... When has a government plan requiring two election wins to start ever actually happened without significant variation? Big difference if you are only talking about one election win.
It's bi-partisan policy this time to build Metro West.

Post Reply

Return to “Discussion - Sydney / NSW”