Inner West Light Rail observations
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Needs a turnback off the running lines and the only one is at Lilyfield and it always seems to have trams parked in it. I think they have timetabling issues too (Esp if trams are running out of schedule), conflicting movements require timetable precision.
- Swift
- Posts: 13247
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:23 pm
- Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra
- Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
**Newsflash** the old Rozelle goods yard has enough room to land a 747 into. They can build a turn back now!
NSW, the state that embraces mediocrity.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Surely that isn’t a major issue they can move the tram elsewhere. Conflicting movements are never ideal preferably it would be a centre turnback of some sort.tonyp wrote:Needs a turnback off the running lines and the only one is at Lilyfield and it always seems to have trams parked in it. I think they have timetabling issues too (Esp if trams are running out of schedule), conflicting movements require timetable precision.
Pretty sure the Rozelle Rail Yards are about to undergo Westconnex works so it would rule that option out.
If the buses ran on-time & were reliable in areas that surrounded the light rail stops it would reduce the pressure on the LR.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Not a single bus route runs along the City West Link. Yes I know buses mostly run along long-established routes and this is a newer road. But so many buses from that area could reach the city so much faster that way instead of via Parramatta Rd. I think there would be a lot of scope for improvement of buses i this area if you focused on the city west link as a trunk.
- Swift
- Posts: 13247
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:23 pm
- Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra
- Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
LR must see buses as competition, hence no services along CWL, though would be a good idea.
NSW, the state that embraces mediocrity.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Unfortunately everything seems to be a major issue for TfNSW when it comes to designing, building and operating tramways. Yes a centre turnback between the tracks would be ideal and they've learnt that lesson at least in the CSELR design. There is room for that solution at Lilyfield but they seemed intent at the time on a short-term need to park spare trams out of the way. They and their consultants never seem to be able to think their way through to ultimate solutions (Dulwich Hill terminus is another example), it's like they can't think past the end of their noses. There's a distinct lack of expertise specifically skilled in the unique requirements of tramways (which are completely and utterly different from railways, which nobody here seems to comprehend), compounded by a stubborn refusal to learn anything from where that expertise lies, like in Central Europe or even Melbourne. This will sort itself out in many years time but it's an agonising process in the meantime.Frosty wrote: Surely that isn’t a major issue they can move the tram elsewhere. Conflicting movements are never ideal preferably it would be a centre turnback of some sort.
Pretty sure the Rozelle Rail Yards are about to undergo Westconnex works so it would rule that option out.
Anyway, the other issue is operation. You can't deftly insert short-workings into a timetable if that timetable isn't operated to schedule. That just leads to chaos. A tramway operated in its own exclusive ROW or in its own lanes should run like a Swiss watch, no matter how big the crowds. Most tram operators around the world would give their right arm for an operating environment so quarantined from mixed traffic and crossing conflicts. Yet they manage to end up out of timetable. I can think of a couple of reasons why, but one shouldn't have to tell them. Both TfNSW and Transdev are supposed to be the experts that we the taxpayers fund with good money to manage competently.
- boronia
- Posts: 21567
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:18 am
- Favourite Vehicle: Ahrens Fox; GMC PD4107
- Location: Sydney NSW
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Many of the LR stops have bus "competition" nearby, but not directly along the route.
The LR has opened up areas for development that would have been unlikely even with a similar bus route.
The LR has opened up areas for development that would have been unlikely even with a similar bus route.
Preserving fire service history
@ The Museum of Fire.
@ The Museum of Fire.
- gilberations
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:36 am
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
In an ideal scenario (where > = feeds into)
Bus > ferry
Bus > light rail
Bus > BRT
Bus > heavy rail
Bus > light rail > heavy rail
Bus > light rail > bus
Bus > ferry
Bus > light rail
Bus > BRT
Bus > heavy rail
Bus > light rail > heavy rail
Bus > light rail > bus
- boronia
- Posts: 21567
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:18 am
- Favourite Vehicle: Ahrens Fox; GMC PD4107
- Location: Sydney NSW
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Even without timetable adherence, how difficult would it be to run a Lilyfield shortworker from Central a couple of minutes ahead of a DH service, put it in the siding, then release it to operate a couple of minutes in front of the next inbound service from DH. The whole network is monitored, so it should not be difficult for a controller to manipulate the reliefs to suit conditions.tonyp wrote: Anyway, the other issue is operation. You can't deftly insert short-workings into a timetable if that timetable isn't operated to schedule. That just leads to chaos. A tramway operated in its own exclusive ROW or in its own lanes should run like a Swiss watch, no matter how big the crowds. Most tram operators around the world would give their right arm for an operating environment so quarantined from mixed traffic and crossing conflicts. Yet they manage to end up out of timetable. I can think of a couple of reasons why, but one shouldn't have to tell them. Both TfNSW and Transdev are supposed to be the experts that we the taxpayers fund with good money to manage competently.
Preserving fire service history
@ The Museum of Fire.
@ The Museum of Fire.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Yes, one would think. What could possibly go wrong?boronia wrote: Even without timetable adherence, how difficult would it be to run a Lilyfield shortworker from Central a couple of minutes ahead of a DH service, put it in the siding, then release it to operate a couple of minutes in front of the next inbound service from DH. The whole network is monitored, so it should not be difficult for a controller to manipulate the reliefs to suit conditions.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Since the 1940s, the bus lobby has educated us to think the reverse of all that - except that the words "light rail" were removed altogether from the equation. Buses can do everything, didn't you know?gilberations wrote:In an ideal scenario (where > = feeds into)
Bus > ferry
Bus > light rail
Bus > BRT
Bus > heavy rail
Bus > light rail > heavy rail
Bus > light rail > bus
- Swift
- Posts: 13247
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:23 pm
- Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra
- Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Slower and with vastly inferior ride quality. I nearly stumbled the other day on an 0500LE thanks to a gear change!tonyp wrote:Buses can do everything, didn't you know?
NSW, the state that embraces mediocrity.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Well they're only slower as a result of a certain entrenched boarding practice at stops, often combined with not enough doors. Correct that and you have the same or better average speed. Ride quality can be brought up to quite a good standard but of course it's never going to be as good as a vehicle on rails except on roads to a billiard table standard. Electrification of buses will improve that even more.Swift wrote:Slower and with vastly inferior ride quality. I nearly stumbled the other day on an 0500LE thanks to a gear change!tonyp wrote:Buses can do everything, didn't you know?
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
And from the 1940s the car lobby has made us believe that cars are ideal feeder services.tonyp wrote: Since the 1940s, the bus lobby has educated us to think the reverse of all that - except that the words "light rail" were removed altogether from the equation. Buses can do everything, didn't you know?
I'm interested in the operating costs of light rail in comparison to buses ?
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
I'd have to dig all that up again but the general picture is that the operating costs of a standard tramway (that is without some costly extra like APS) is less than that of a matching bus service, but of course there has to be an initial capital cost in building the infrastructure of a tramway (which buses would also incur if busways are built, but otherwise their infrastructure costs are absorbed in the general roads costs).Frosty wrote:
I'm interested in the operating costs of light rail in comparison to buses ?
After years of denying that electric trams and trolleybuses are cheaper to run than diesel buses, the bus industry now provides a little clue as to the truth in suddenly promoting the much cheaper operating costs of electric buses compared to diesel buses. Maintaining and fueling a diesel power system is certainly expensive compared to running an electric drive. Of course there is the question of the deal on the electricity rates that the operator can negotiate and/or, nowadays, the cost of buying, maintaining and cyclical replacement of a battery system.
- Fleet Lists
- Administrator
- Posts: 23803
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: The Shire
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
https://transportnsw.info/news/2018/ext ... l-services
Extra Inner West Light Rail Services
Monday 30 July 2018
From 6 August additional Inner West Light Rail services will be introduced. New services will provide more frequent services that are less crowded and reduce wait times.
Between 10am to 2pm, extra services will improve frequency from 13 to 12 minutes, in line with the schedule already in place on the popular Wednesday services.
The change will mean a 12 minute frequency on all weekdays between 10am and 3pm.
The afternoon peak will be extended to offer services every 8 minutes from 3pm to 7pm.
Living in the Shire.
-
- Posts: 2590
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 3:14 pm
- Location: Botany NSW
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Additionally, trams may have a longer life than buses.tonyp wrote: I'd have to dig all that up again but the general picture is that the operating costs of a standard tramway (that is without some costly extra like APS) is less than that of a matching bus service, but of course there has to be an initial capital cost in building the infrastructure of a tramway (which buses would also incur if busways are built, but otherwise their infrastructure costs are absorbed in the general roads costs).
Tony Bailey
http://www.transitaustralia.com.au
http://www.transitaustralia.com.au
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
True - and it can be noted that trolleybuses typically have a longer life than diesel buses and so probably will battery-electric buses. Electric traction has many advantages.Tonymercury wrote:
Additionally, trams may have a longer life than buses.
- Swift
- Posts: 13247
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:23 pm
- Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra
- Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
The government would have probably operated AEC buses beyond 1979 if they had retained both the beloved trolley systems we once had in Sydney.
NSW, the state that embraces mediocrity.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Albeit Variotrams only lasted 1997-2015Tonymercury wrote: Additionally, trams may have a longer life than buses.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Yes - between 10am and 2pm that's one extra trip every two hoursFleet Lists wrote:https://transportnsw.info/news/2018/ext ... l-servicesExtra Inner West Light Rail Services
Monday 30 July 2018
From 6 August additional Inner West Light Rail services will be introduced. New services will provide more frequent services that are less crowded and reduce wait times.
Between 10am to 2pm, extra services will improve frequency from 13 to 12 minutes, in line with the schedule already in place on the popular Wednesday services.
The change will mean a 12 minute frequency on all weekdays between 10am and 3pm.
The afternoon peak will be extended to offer services every 8 minutes from 3pm to 7pm.
- Swift
- Posts: 13247
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:23 pm
- Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra
- Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
12 minutes is still pathetic, but not as much as bothering to announce it like it's revolutionary.
NSW, the state that embraces mediocrity.
- boronia
- Posts: 21567
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:18 am
- Favourite Vehicle: Ahrens Fox; GMC PD4107
- Location: Sydney NSW
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
Yes - between 10am and 2pm that's one extra trip every two hours [/quote]Bovways wrote: Extra Inner West Light Rail Services
Monday 30 July 2018
From 6 August additional Inner West Light Rail services will be introduced. New services will provide more frequent services that are less crowded and reduce wait times.
Between 10am to 2pm, extra services will improve frequency from 13 to 12 minutes, in line with the schedule already in place on the popular Wednesday services.
The change will mean a 12 minute frequency on all weekdays between 10am and 3pm.
The afternoon peak will be extended to offer services every 8 minutes from 3pm to 7pm.
Actually 1.5 trips over 4 hours. How generous.
Preserving fire service history
@ The Museum of Fire.
@ The Museum of Fire.
Re: Inner West Light Rail observations
It could well make a material difference between the service immediately before and immediately after the said increase, but otherwise, meh! A Press Release moment.
- Fleet Lists
- Administrator
- Posts: 23803
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: The Shire