The Worst Cars Ever Number 9: Ford Capri Convertible
Moderator: busrider
- Member1100
- Posts: 2869
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 10:46 pm
- Location: Melbourne
The Worst Cars Ever Number 9: Ford Capri Convertible
Summary:
Name: Ford Capri Cabriolet
Type: 2 Door Convertible
Price Range when New: $22,000 - 25,000
Market Value Now: $3800 -4700
Nickname: Ford Crapi
Above: When a car is marketed as being fun and sporty at a cheap price, it usually means its going to be more trouble than its worth. And the Ford Capri was no exception.
In the late 1980s, both Ford and Mazda, who already were enjoying a close business relationship through model sharing arrangements, were simultaneously working on releasing a 4 cylinder open top Roadster. One would go on to become a cult classic, the other the butt of jokes all around the world......the Ford Capri.
When both were released, the Mazda MX5 roadster quickly earned respect and popularity for its modern striking design, superior handling and good build quality. Unfortunatly for Ford, the Capri, which shared many mechanical components with the MX5, earned exactly the opposite reputation. Designed in Italy, built in Melbourne, the Capri was built with a high priority on cracking the US market. However, the design of the Capri looked out dated before it even left the showroom floor. Where Mazda went with a more rounded and modern looking design, Ford went square with sharp edges. In droves, buyers went for the Mazda. For those who decided they liked the Capri better, their problems were only just beginning.
It would soon become apparent that the build quality of the Capri was questionable at best. It wasnt long before Capri owners were complaining of rattles and squeaks coming from all corners of the car. The dashboard on the Capri was cheap feeling plastic, adding little to the appeal, or lack of appeal rather, of the Capri. And soon after that, the roof of the Capri became a focus point for complaints. Mazda had designed a very easy to use fold back roof in which you more or less could just throw the roof over your head and down behind your back. The Capri was a much different story. Owners would joke about the fact that they almost had to call roadside assistance just to get the roof up and down. And then came the major complaint that Capri owners bombarded Ford with. When rain fell, the driver and passenger would most likely be drenched......and that was with the roof closed. The nylon roof used on the Capri quickly developed a reputation for leaking....a problem which to this day Ford has never really rectified. In most cases, if you were to buy a Ford Capri second hand, chances are it has had its fourth or fifth roof installed now. The paint on the Capri was appalling. Many, especially the red, yellow and blue ones began to fade within 5 years of manufacture, much to the further disappointment to the people who had been sucked in to buying this motoring attrocity. Despite sharing a similar motor initially, the Mazda seemed to be quicker than the Capri. The Capri had a 77kw 1.6litre Fuel injected motor, however it simply felt like driving a wet sponge.
Ford was aiming for 25,000 sales a year for the Capri, which it almost achieved in its first year of release, with a figure of 24,000 cars sold around the world. However the following year saw the beginning of a sales freefall as the reputation of the Capri as being soft on top, bottom and sides caught up with it. Attempts to improve its reputation with a Series 2 model, plus the addition of a Turbo model did little to improve sales of the Capri. Finally in 1993 Ford came to its senses and closed the curtain on a car that had so much potential, but was a catastrophe from day 1. The Mazda MX5 has improved greatly since its early days and today it is a highly regard roadster still selling impressively. The Ford Capri will for ever go down as one of Fords many mistakes. And a costly one at that.
Name: Ford Capri Cabriolet
Type: 2 Door Convertible
Price Range when New: $22,000 - 25,000
Market Value Now: $3800 -4700
Nickname: Ford Crapi
Above: When a car is marketed as being fun and sporty at a cheap price, it usually means its going to be more trouble than its worth. And the Ford Capri was no exception.
In the late 1980s, both Ford and Mazda, who already were enjoying a close business relationship through model sharing arrangements, were simultaneously working on releasing a 4 cylinder open top Roadster. One would go on to become a cult classic, the other the butt of jokes all around the world......the Ford Capri.
When both were released, the Mazda MX5 roadster quickly earned respect and popularity for its modern striking design, superior handling and good build quality. Unfortunatly for Ford, the Capri, which shared many mechanical components with the MX5, earned exactly the opposite reputation. Designed in Italy, built in Melbourne, the Capri was built with a high priority on cracking the US market. However, the design of the Capri looked out dated before it even left the showroom floor. Where Mazda went with a more rounded and modern looking design, Ford went square with sharp edges. In droves, buyers went for the Mazda. For those who decided they liked the Capri better, their problems were only just beginning.
It would soon become apparent that the build quality of the Capri was questionable at best. It wasnt long before Capri owners were complaining of rattles and squeaks coming from all corners of the car. The dashboard on the Capri was cheap feeling plastic, adding little to the appeal, or lack of appeal rather, of the Capri. And soon after that, the roof of the Capri became a focus point for complaints. Mazda had designed a very easy to use fold back roof in which you more or less could just throw the roof over your head and down behind your back. The Capri was a much different story. Owners would joke about the fact that they almost had to call roadside assistance just to get the roof up and down. And then came the major complaint that Capri owners bombarded Ford with. When rain fell, the driver and passenger would most likely be drenched......and that was with the roof closed. The nylon roof used on the Capri quickly developed a reputation for leaking....a problem which to this day Ford has never really rectified. In most cases, if you were to buy a Ford Capri second hand, chances are it has had its fourth or fifth roof installed now. The paint on the Capri was appalling. Many, especially the red, yellow and blue ones began to fade within 5 years of manufacture, much to the further disappointment to the people who had been sucked in to buying this motoring attrocity. Despite sharing a similar motor initially, the Mazda seemed to be quicker than the Capri. The Capri had a 77kw 1.6litre Fuel injected motor, however it simply felt like driving a wet sponge.
Ford was aiming for 25,000 sales a year for the Capri, which it almost achieved in its first year of release, with a figure of 24,000 cars sold around the world. However the following year saw the beginning of a sales freefall as the reputation of the Capri as being soft on top, bottom and sides caught up with it. Attempts to improve its reputation with a Series 2 model, plus the addition of a Turbo model did little to improve sales of the Capri. Finally in 1993 Ford came to its senses and closed the curtain on a car that had so much potential, but was a catastrophe from day 1. The Mazda MX5 has improved greatly since its early days and today it is a highly regard roadster still selling impressively. The Ford Capri will for ever go down as one of Fords many mistakes. And a costly one at that.
- Member1100
- Posts: 2869
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 10:46 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- jb17kx
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:51 pm
- Favourite Vehicle: Irisbus Agoraline
- Location: Not Toorak. No. Definitely not...
- Contact:
British Leyland is going to have an offering in there somewhere, aren't they?
Selected artistic and gunzel photos from my collection - http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb17kx
- tone167
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:58 am
- Favourite Vehicle: R.I.P. MAN SL200 (1982-2011)
- Location: Between Aldgate and Lonsdale
- Contact:
Now this I don't (entirely) agree with.
I think the Capri was just misunderstood by both the public and those who were building them.
Think about it ... the Capri's drivetrain is pure 1985 Mazda 323. I don't believe for one second that a nearly bulletproof drivetrain such as the one that was powering 323s and Lasers well into the mid 1990s could suddenly go pear-shaped just because it's in a convertible rather than in a hatchback.
Sure, some had leaky roofs. Then again, so did many other convertibles of the day - it was hardly a Capri-centric fault. And maybe it wasn't as well screwed together as a Laser. Given that it was built for American tastes (where the Yanks are used to p!ss poor build quality from their domestic models) and that it didn't have the structural rigidity of a car with a roof, it's understandable that some people got a bit less than they were expecting.
If everyone was expecting nothing more than a Laser convertible, people would have been less disappointed. The fact that Ford was talking up the Capri as though it was a proper sportscar and that the punters initially believed it (despite its humble origins) is why the Capri wasn't so much a bad car as a badly marketed one.
Would I buy a Capri? Hell yes! If I wanted a fun weekend car that is as easy to live with as the KE Laser I had a few years back (after all, a Capri IS just a KE Laser without a roof) for not a lot of money, then why not.
I think the Capri was just misunderstood by both the public and those who were building them.
Think about it ... the Capri's drivetrain is pure 1985 Mazda 323. I don't believe for one second that a nearly bulletproof drivetrain such as the one that was powering 323s and Lasers well into the mid 1990s could suddenly go pear-shaped just because it's in a convertible rather than in a hatchback.
Sure, some had leaky roofs. Then again, so did many other convertibles of the day - it was hardly a Capri-centric fault. And maybe it wasn't as well screwed together as a Laser. Given that it was built for American tastes (where the Yanks are used to p!ss poor build quality from their domestic models) and that it didn't have the structural rigidity of a car with a roof, it's understandable that some people got a bit less than they were expecting.
If everyone was expecting nothing more than a Laser convertible, people would have been less disappointed. The fact that Ford was talking up the Capri as though it was a proper sportscar and that the punters initially believed it (despite its humble origins) is why the Capri wasn't so much a bad car as a badly marketed one.
Would I buy a Capri? Hell yes! If I wanted a fun weekend car that is as easy to live with as the KE Laser I had a few years back (after all, a Capri IS just a KE Laser without a roof) for not a lot of money, then why not.
Saab 900 1978-93: The best Scania ever made.
- Atlantean
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:46 pm
- Favourite Vehicle: Leyland Worldmaster
- Location: Back from holidays unfortunately
Ford Capri
I thought that was Sol from Telstra behind the wheel as well. If he wants to be a friend of the Aussie public he should get a nice HQ Kingswood.
I love the smell of bus exhaust in the morning!
- boronia
- Posts: 21567
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:18 am
- Favourite Vehicle: Ahrens Fox; GMC PD4107
- Location: Sydney NSW
Sadly, the Capri WAS designed from scratch as a convertible. There is no direct sedan equivalent.John wrote:Spot on.ABS wrote:Keep in mind any chassis will turn to XXX once to take the roof off unless the structure is properly designed to compensate.
Even some supercars have this problem and thus it is better to design a convertible from scratch.
The previous Ford Capri, a pommie two door "sports" coupe, was a much more desirable car.
- Member1100
- Posts: 2869
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 10:46 pm
- Location: Melbourne
While I admire your attempts to defend the merits of the Ford Capri, I do have to set you straight. The Ford Capri is recognized by many sources as being a very poorly constructed car over all. Take away the convertible aspect of it, the Capri was still riddled with poor fitting panels, a paint quality that was way below the normal standards even at that time, and the fact that the Capri was extremely under powered.tone167 wrote:Now this I don't (entirely) agree with.
I think the Capri was just misunderstood by both the public and those who were building them.
Think about it ... the Capri's drivetrain is pure 1985 Mazda 323. I don't believe for one second that a nearly bulletproof drivetrain such as the one that was powering 323s and Lasers well into the mid 1990s could suddenly go pear-shaped just because it's in a convertible rather than in a hatchback.
Sure, some had leaky roofs. Then again, so did many other convertibles of the day - it was hardly a Capri-centric fault. And maybe it wasn't as well screwed together as a Laser. Given that it was built for American tastes (where the Yanks are used to p!ss poor build quality from their domestic models) and that it didn't have the structural rigidity of a car with a roof, it's understandable that some people got a bit less than they were expecting.
If everyone was expecting nothing more than a Laser convertible, people would have been less disappointed. The fact that Ford was talking up the Capri as though it was a proper sportscar and that the punters initially believed it (despite its humble origins) is why the Capri wasn't so much a bad car as a badly marketed one.
Would I buy a Capri? Hell yes! If I wanted a fun weekend car that is as easy to live with as the KE Laser I had a few years back (after all, a Capri IS just a KE Laser without a roof) for not a lot of money, then why not.
THe Mazda MX5 was a very similar car in many ways, containing a 1.6litre Fuel injected motor much like the Capri, however it was constructed as a Rear Wheel Drive as opposed to the Capri and its Front Wheel Drive construction.
The Mazda was a much better built car in almost all aspects...including the roof.....which in the Mazdas case has shown very few problems with leakage. Infact its still common to buy one of the original Mazda MX5 convertibles second hand today still with its original roof.....something virtually unheard of with the Capri.
Sorry mate, but the Capri is one car Ford is more than happy to try and forget they ever did.
- Member1100
- Posts: 2869
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 10:46 pm
- Location: Melbourne
As you will soon see when we work our way down towards Number 1, the Leyland company, and its affiliates (Morris, Austin, Rover) were serial offenders when it came to automotive attrocities.jb17kx wrote:British Leyland is going to have an offering in there somewhere, aren't they?
Im struggling to construct the 10 Worst Cars Ever without fitting more than 1 Leyland branded vehicle in.
- tone167
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:58 am
- Favourite Vehicle: R.I.P. MAN SL200 (1982-2011)
- Location: Between Aldgate and Lonsdale
- Contact:
No more underpowered than a KE Laser of the day, which - despite being bettered by the likes of the Nissan Pulsar - was still a competent device for tooling around the city as well as the occasional cross-country run.Eratik wrote: The Ford Capri is recognized by many sources as being a very poorly constructed car over all. No worse than most other Australian cars of the day, or since. The VN Commodore was argub Take away the convertible aspect of it, the Capri was still riddled with poor fitting panels, a paint quality that was way below the normal standards even at that time, and the fact that the Capri was extremely under powered.
As for the poor panel fit, fading paint and overall crappiness of the build quality, it's no worse than the VN Commodore. You don't hear too many people bagging VN Commdores, even though they were arguably the worst Commodore ever built. But, of course, there are many Holden fanboys out there who are more than happy to drown out the chorus of (legitimate) detractors, so the VN slips under the radar ... and no doubt will totally miss the cut in your Top 10 Aussie Sh!tboxes Of All Time.
Saab 900 1978-93: The best Scania ever made.
- Stoney!
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:38 pm
- Favourite Vehicle: Mercedes Benz o405
- Location: Somewhere on the northern peninsula
- Contact:
LELAND MARINA!!! and P76 of course.Eratik wrote:As you will soon see when we work our way down towards Number 1, the Leyland company, and its affiliates (Morris, Austin, Rover) were serial offenders when it came to automotive attrocities.jb17kx wrote:British Leyland is going to have an offering in there somewhere, aren't they?
*Ducks and hides from mosman was*
Also i don't believe the telstar was all that bad, specially the 1990 model with long lists of equipment in the ghia and a ippy 2.2 injcted engine.
Stoney!
Proud Volkswagen Golf owner...
Mercees o305g:- one of the best buses ever built
Mercees o305g:- one of the best buses ever built
- Member1100
- Posts: 2869
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 10:46 pm
- Location: Melbourne
The VN doesnt make the Top 10. The VN by far wasnt the best Commodore ever built, but when compared to its rival of the same year...the EA Falcon, which makes up number 6 on the list (There you go, a scoop for you all) all i can say is.......at least the Commodores dash stayed intact.Andrew wrote:The VN should definitely be in there - assuming Eratik's list is Australian-centric - not a world wide list.....
- Member1100
- Posts: 2869
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 10:46 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- jb17kx
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:51 pm
- Favourite Vehicle: Irisbus Agoraline
- Location: Not Toorak. No. Definitely not...
- Contact:
Fiat?Eratik wrote:Number 8 is a European brand that was once fairly well respected.....until the 1980s when for whatever reason.....their quality control went down quicker than a $2 hooker.
Selected artistic and gunzel photos from my collection - http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb17kx