• Advertisement

Hard to follow threads.

News and comments about this board.

Hard to follow threads.

Postby Swift » Tue Mar 15, 2016 9:41 am

Is there anything that can be done to curb overly technical language used in some threads that are hard to follow to the casual reader.
It seems as though they have evolved to be only read by hard core followers of the particular thread.
One thread I have a particular beef with is the NSW rail observations thread with convoluted writing together with bad grammar in places and most irritating, high reliance on acronyms throughout.
If you are going to use them, at least start off with the full wording with it's acronym in brackets before using it in the rest of the post.
Not everyone is a hard core follower of a particular specialty in transport and it comes of as trying to be exclusive. The idea of sharing ideas has been lost by some.
Beautiful beguiling Renk Doromat. Bringing visceral joy to driveline connoisseurs. 8)
User avatar
Swift
 
Posts: 8711
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.
Has thanked: 453 times
Been thanked: 325 times
Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra

Re: Hard to follow threads.

Postby simonl » Tue Mar 15, 2016 12:05 pm

Are you referring to common internet abbreviations that you can google?

Some I can understand your point e.g. SWA - Steering Wheel Attendant.
simonl
 
Posts: 7809
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 7:03 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Has thanked: 823 times
Been thanked: 352 times

Re: Hard to follow threads.

Postby Swift » Tue Mar 15, 2016 3:40 pm

No, I'm referring to Sydney Trains operational specific acronyms bandied about like common language.
Just look at the March rail observations thread to see plenty of examples like PID, config 13, LICS, T1, T3,T4 etc etc.
It's like an aspergers fest and impossible to keep up for someone with only a passing interest to things rail.
Beautiful beguiling Renk Doromat. Bringing visceral joy to driveline connoisseurs. 8)
User avatar
Swift
 
Posts: 8711
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.
Has thanked: 453 times
Been thanked: 325 times
Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra

Re: Hard to follow threads.

Postby Fleet Lists » Tue Mar 15, 2016 3:50 pm

Most people in Sydney would know what T1, T2 etc stand for.

But this from a Swift post only today:
an M bus
. So how far do we go? I suspect that M would be less meaningful than the T train line numbers to most people.
Living in the Shire.
User avatar
Fleet Lists
Administrator
 
Posts: 19284
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 11:49 am
Location: The Shire
Has thanked: 923 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Hard to follow threads.

Postby Swift » Tue Mar 15, 2016 4:12 pm

The rail thread clearly has far more problems with use of these obscure codes than occasional bus depot codes which is pretty straightforward in comparison.
Beautiful beguiling Renk Doromat. Bringing visceral joy to driveline connoisseurs. 8)
User avatar
Swift
 
Posts: 8711
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Ettalong- the world capital of 0405s.
Has thanked: 453 times
Been thanked: 325 times
Favourite Vehicle: Porshe 911 Carerra

Re: Hard to follow threads.

Postby busrider » Tue Mar 15, 2016 4:49 pm

I don't know about all of the acronyms used, but T1, T2 etc are train line numbers which can be found on the Sydney Trains website: http://www.sydneytrains.info/
User avatar
busrider
Moderator
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Not in the Gutta
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 203 times
Favourite Vehicle: Maybe not my car...

Re: Hard to follow threads.

Postby Lt. Commander Data » Tue Mar 15, 2016 10:00 pm

TT can mean 4 things (in SA at least). TT as in Torrens Transit, TT as in Timetable, TT as in Transit times. There's also the user "TT", so context is always important when using acronyms. Personally I don't use TT anymore (unless referring to the user), I use Torrens for TT, and leave the other two meanings in their full form so as not to confuse anyone.

I agree with Swift, the first time you're going to use an acronym, put in brackets what it means so everyone is on the same page. There are exceptions to this (like if your post was only going to be one sentance or so), but it's a good general rule.
First person on 822, 865 (2016 re-route).
Last person on 867, 868.
Adelaide Metro Photography. For all your Adelaide bus photo needs.
User avatar
Lt. Commander Data
 
Posts: 1988
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 8:09 am
Location: Stirling (West), South Australia
Has thanked: 1010 times
Been thanked: 206 times
Favourite Vehicle: Volgren CR224Ls (esp. 3269)

Re: Hard to follow threads.

Postby Newcastle Flyer » Sun Jul 17, 2016 5:30 pm

Swift wrote:The rail thread clearly has far more problems with use of these obscure codes than occasional bus depot codes which is pretty straightforward in comparison.

And one letter bus depot codes you can't search, and no it's not that straightforward. Newer members wouldn't know what "V" stands for. They might think it means Vaucluse, Villawood or Vineyard for example. (I know it's not).

Do private bus depots have one letter codes?
Signature on holidays
User avatar
Newcastle Flyer
 
Posts: 4155
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: Somewhere between here, there & anywhere!
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 95 times



  • Advertisement

Return to News & Administration

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests